Addressing mental health needs in shelter homes: lessons from a case study in Uttarakhand, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47203/IJCH.2026.v38i03.018Keywords:
Mental health, Homelessness, Shelter homes, Women’s rehabilitation, Uttarakhand case study, Stigma, Community reintegrationAbstract
Mental health is increasingly recognized as integral to overall well-being, yet stigma, systemic neglect, and limited access to services remain major barriers in India, where nearly 197 million people are affected. Homeless individuals, particularly women, face compounded challenges, with shelter homes often lacking adequate medical and psychosocial support. This case study from Mahila/Kishori/Kishor Kalyan Kendra in Kedarpur, Uttarakhand, highlights how targeted reforms transformed a women’s shelter home into a rehabilitative space. Initiatives between 2016–17 improved safety, sanitation, nutrition, medical care, and psychosocial engagement. Structured activities, vocational training, and financial inclusion promoted empowerment, while family tracing and reunification efforts restored dignity and social belonging. Outcomes included significant reductions in acute psychosis, improved physical rehabilitation, and over 450 successful reunifications, including cross-border cases. The Uttarakhand model demonstrates that low-cost, comprehensive interventions can break the cycle of homelessness and mental illness, aligning with global frameworks such as WHO’s Mental Health Action Plan. Scaling such approaches across India could reposition shelter homes as transitional spaces fostering recovery, reintegration, and long-term resilience.
Downloads
References
1. World Health Organization. Mental health: strengthening our response. Geneva: WHO; 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response
2. Sagar R, Dandona R, Gururaj G, Dhaliwal RS, Singh A, Ferrari A, et al. The burden of mental disorders across the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2017. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(2):148–61.
3. Gururaj G, Varghese M, Benegal V, Rao GN, Pathak K, Singh LK, et al. National Mental Health Survey of India, 2015–16: Summary. Bengaluru: National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS); 2016.
4. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Census of India 2011: Primary Census Abstract for Households and Housing. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 2011.
5. National Urban Livelihoods Mission (NULM). (2019). Shelters for Urban Homeless: Review of availability, access, and services. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India.
6. Tsemberis S, Gulcur L, Nakae M. Housing First, consumer choice, and harm reduction for homeless individuals with a dual diagnosis. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(4):651–6.
7. Patel V, Saxena S, Lund C, Thornicroft G, Baingana F, Bolton P, et al. The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development. Lancet. 2018;392(10157):1553–98.
8. Chatterjee S, Pillai A, Jain S, Cohen A, Patel V. Outcomes of people with psychotic disorders in a community-based rehabilitation programme in rural India. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199(6):459–65.
9. World Health Organization. Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan 2013–2030. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bhupinder Kaur Aulakh (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
